From a GEO Score to a Recovery Queue
A visibility dashboard tells you you’re losing. The Recovery Queue tells you the exact source behind each loss, who to influence, and hands you a send-ready draft — then watches whether the answer changes.
A score is a diagnosis, not a treatment
Most GEO tools stop at the number. They tell you the AI leaves you out, or gets a fact wrong, and then hand you a chart. Knowing you’re absent is the alarm — but an alarm you can’t act on is just anxiety with a dashboard.
The reason action is hard is that the work is buried: which of the dozens of cited pages actually feeds this answer, whether you can even change it, who you’d have to reach, and what you’d say. The Recovery Queue does that triage for you — it turns each loss into one concrete, shippable move.
Contest the lost answer
For every buyer question where the AI recommends a competitor and leaves you out, the queue finds the off-site source feeding that win, tells you how much leverage you actually have over it, and drafts the exact outreach or page change to earn your place.
A Reddit thread you can join transparently, a listicle whose editor you can pitch, a review profile to complete, a comparison page you publish yourself — each gets a send-ready draft you copy out and use today, with bracketed placeholders for the few facts only you know.
- See the one source feeding the competitor’s win, not a wall of citations.
- Know whether to publish, pitch, join a thread, or out-publish.
- Copy a draft written in a founder’s voice — no fabricated facts.
Correct the record at its source
When the AI states something false about you — wrong pricing, a feature you don’t have, the wrong category — the queue traces that claim to the specific source most likely teaching it, and where we can fetch the page to confirm your brand actually appears on it, we say so instead of sending you to chase a guess.
Then it drafts a polite, factual correction that states the true fact and asks the source to update, plus a clarification you can post on your own highest-authority page so the engines have a credible source to re-learn from.
- Each false claim is traced to its suspected — and where confirmed, verified — source.
- A correction draft states the truth without overstating it.
- When nothing third-party is cited, the fix lands on a page you own.
Honest by construction
Mark an item shipped and it joins the same weekly loop that watches your tracked prompts: we keep re-sampling that exact question across engines and report whether the answer changed — up or down. We surface the change; we never claim we caused it.
And we’re straight about the horizon. The drafts are starting points, not guarantees, and model answers shift over weeks to months as they re-crawl — so a correction moves toward resolved when the engines stop repeating it, not overnight. The point isn’t a vanity score; it’s a short, honest list of the next things worth shipping.
See it on your own brand
What is AI telling your buyers right now?
Builder radar samples 9 grounded AI engines with your buyers' real questions, stores every answer verbatim, and alerts you when an answer changes — with the receipt.
Keep reading